Weaker Lies, Weaker Arguments
It appears that Brian J. Kemp is using even weaker arguments and lies in order to validate an image he either photoshopped himself or had another photoshop. All while riding on delusions he has some sort of legal case against the victims he stalks: Clyde, myself, Glen, Casey, CreatorLuther69.
The proof.
Quote
The very way Brian words it all is very telling of so much.
I shall touch upon all of what Brian has had to say.
To my lurkers/stalkers that block and unblock: you clearly don’t think. You say that the view list was photoshopped, how is it that I managed to block “Luther” (Glen) and it’s the most recent block. Because the moment I saw “Luther” lurking, I was able to block them. Duh!
So, let me get this straight right here and now. Brian Kemp is very much saying that he couldn't have blocked CreatorLuther69 ("Luther The Creator") if they didn't lurk his profile. That entire statement by Brian is false. Anyone can block anyone by doing a search, clicking on a username, going to their profile, and clicking on block. But according to Brian you can't block someone unless they look at your profile first. Brian's way of covering up the fact that what he showed was photoshopped is a very weak argument at best. I also noticed that Brian is still going with the false notion that Glen is CreatorLuther69. As I have said before, Brian Kemp has been all over the place when it comes to accusing his victims of being the same person.
The only thing edited, are the blackout scribbles which you can do on an iPhone when you take a screenshot. Duh!
This doesn't absolve Brian Kemp of anything. He could have easily taken a screenshot. Sent to himself on his PC. Then photoshopped it and sent back to his phone. That or he had someone else do the photoshopping. Then had it sent back to him and his phone. Just because scribbles can be done with a phone doesn't mean it isn't possible to send the image elsewhere, photoshop it, and send it back.
The level of false accusations, libel, slander is atmospheric.
Neither myself, Clyde, Glen, Casey, or CreatorLuther69 has slandered or defamed Brian J. Kemp. All that is said has been proven and backed up.
I have leads to multiple attorneys, now just gotta figure which one can help.
A half-assed scare tactic at best by Brian Kemp. He has no legal grounds. All that has been said about him has been backed up and proven. The truth is not slander or defamation. Since the truth has hurt his fragile ego, perhaps he should try an age old concept of......stop harassing, stop lurking/stalking.
I don’t stalk. I simply find out.
Brian Kemp's way of justifying his lurking/stalking
If you didn’t want me to find out, then make it non-Googleable.
This is merely Brian Kemp's excuse for his lurking/stalking. Not everything that's been proven about him is found via Google. Some yes. But not all. He is merely saying this to cover up his lurking/stalking.
This was the only threat I ever made: to take it the legal level. I told them I wasn’t playing, but they just kept on going.
Brian J. Kemp has made several threats. All of which have been more than proven by myself, Clyde, Glen, and Casey.
Brian J. Kemp has said that he's been slandered and defamed by myself, Glen, Casey, and Clyde. None of us have defamed or slandered him. All that we have said has been proven and shown. That is the truth. The truth is not slander.
All previous blogs regarding Brian J. Kemp detailing harassment, lurking/stalking, obsession, and threats.
Quote
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
4 Comments
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now